Mutual AI Supervisory Coordinator
See how Italian and Albanian national services would govern a third, shared coordinator in a synthetic support exercise.
Three systems and who decides
- Italian national node. Authorized staff verify their aggregate support figures and decide whether to share a limited summary. Local procedures and records stay under national control.
- Mutual AI Supervisory Coordinator (MASC). The proposed third system would receive only the summary approved for exchange. It could flag a conflicting total or request a correction for national staff to review.
- Albanian national node. Authorized staff decide whether to receive a summary, acknowledge corrections, and act under their own mandate. Either country can initiate the same process.
The coordinator has a narrow analytical role. National staff retain responsibility for approvals, disclosures, corrections, and service decisions. The exercise uses deterministic rules and invented aggregate summaries.
What survives when the channel fails?
During an outage or after withdrawal, each service returns to its own approved procedures. Stop new disclosures and review drafts again before restarting. For previously shared material, record the withdrawal or correction, confirm receipt, and review retention and access under the applicable mandate.
Try the three-system handoff
This tabletop starts with independently tested local procedures for both countries. Receiving requests, scheduling local support, and keeping decision records continue if the shared channel stops.